The Canon of Scripture
A more approachable history of the same question, from an evangelical scholar.
Nobody voted on the Bible in one room. It was edited for 1,700 years, by a lot of people, and some of them never agreed. Here is the log.
There was no single printed "Old Testament" yet. Greek-speaking communities read books that later Hebrew lists left out, and the Qumran library held many copies of Enoch and Jubilees.
Go deeperMarcion rejected the God of Genesis and published a short list of his own. Mainstream churches excommunicated him, and then had to start saying which books they did accept.
In Against Heresies, Irenaeus argues there can be exactly four gospels, as there are four winds and four corners of the earth. Many other gospels were in circulation when he wrote this.
Go deeperlate 2nd century (date debated)
A Latin fragment that lists most of what became the New Testament. It also shows how much was still open.
Go deeperChurch History 3.25 is a survey, not a ruling. It shows books we now take for granted still under argument three centuries after Jesus.
Nicaea dealt with Arius, the date of Easter and church discipline. No surviving canon of the council touches the list of books. The story that it chose the Bible is much later legend, and novels spread it further.
Go deeperOne of the two oldest near-complete Bibles in existence includes both books. You can read it online, page by page.
Go deeperHis 39th Festal Letter went out to churches across Egypt. It was one bishop's instruction, not a universal decree, and other lists kept circulating for centuries.
Go deeperPapers reused in the bindings date the codices to the mid-fourth century. Linking the burial to Athanasius is an attractive guess and nobody can prove it. Someone chose burial over burning.
Go deeperNorth African bishops, with Augustine involved, recognize the list. These are the councils people usually mean, and they were regional.
Jerome preferred the Hebrew list and said so. His Latin Bible, the Vulgate, carried those books for the next thousand years regardless.
While the Greek and Latin worlds let these books go, Ethiopia copied them in Ge'ez. That is why we have complete texts at all.
Go deeperLuther kept them in his Bible and called them useful and good to read. The reordering is still visible in German Bibles.
This is the first time the Catholic Church defined its list with that level of finality. The rejected books were later printed in an appendix to the official Latin Bible.
Go deeperThe original King James Bible included them. Readers who think of the KJV as the Bible without the extras are thinking of later printings.
Go deeperThe Scottish traveler brought copies home from Ethiopia. Richard Laurence published an English translation in 1821, and Western readers could finally check what Jude had been quoting.
Go deeperNo council did this. A funding policy did. Mass-distributed Bibles stopped carrying the books, and within a few generations most English readers had never seen them.
The Berlin Codex was not published until 1955. Pages 1-6 and 11-14 of the gospel are gone.
Go deeperTexts scholars knew mostly from the people condemning them, in their own words at last.
Go deeperHebrew manuscripts a thousand years older than any previously known. Also proof that Enoch was read in Judea long before Jude quoted it.
Go deeperRead it top to bottom and three things stand out. There was no moment when it all got decided. The people doing the editing disagreed with each other, and some of those disagreements, such as the one with Ethiopia, never ended. And the most recent big change in the English-speaking world came from a funding policy, not a council.
Three lists exist today, and each is a real community's answer. If this makes you trust the Bible less, sit with that. If it makes you trust it more because so many hands had to agree, sit with that too.
No single person or council did. Books came into use across churches over about three centuries, Athanasius listed the 27 New Testament books in 367, regional synods approved the list in the 390s, and the Catholic Church formally defined its full list only at Trent in 1546.
It depends on the tradition. The Catholic canon was formally fixed in 1546. Protestant Bibles dropped the Apocrypha in practice only after 1826. The Ethiopian Orthodox canon is larger still and includes 1 Enoch and Jubilees.
Strictly, there was never one agreed Bible to remove things from. The closest thing to removal is the Protestant Apocrypha, printed in the 1611 King James and dropped from most English Bibles in the 1800s.
A more approachable history of the same question, from an evangelical scholar.
The reference on how the list actually formed, from a scholar who spent a lifetime on it.
The story behind the texts: who wrote them, who lost the argument, and how the winners told it afterward.
These are plain store links. We earn nothing from them. How this works.
What it says, why it was cut, and which edition is worth your money. Plus the full reading list today.